Spinal and Tuberal Implants

Spinal and tuberal implants are variants of the posterior implants used in basal implantology for the rehabilitation of the atrophic upper jaw, offering alternative solutions to the pterygoid implant depending on the patient's bone morphology.

Spinal implant

The spinal implant anchors to the posterior nasal spine, a bone structure at the junction between maxilla and sphenoid with good quality bone. It is used when the morphology of the maxillary tuber does not allow a standard pterygoid path, when the quality of the tuberal bone is insufficient or when additional anchorage is needed in the posterior median area.

The spinal implant is a type of implant that anchors to the posterior nasal spine, a bone structure located in the posterior portion of the hard palate, at the junction between maxilla and sphenoid. This area offers good quality bone for the anchorage of posterior implants.

The spinal implant is used when:

Tuberal implant

The tuberal implant is inserted directly in the maxillary tuber, the posterior portion of the alveolar process. With a typical length of 10-14 mm, it anchors exclusively in the tuber without reaching the sphenoid. It requires a sufficient quantity of residual tuberal bone and is less stable than the pterygoid implant in case of severe atrophy, but it represents an option when the tuber is well preserved.

The tuberal implant is inserted directly in the maxillary tuber, the posterior portion of the alveolar process of the upper maxilla. It is a shorter implant compared to the pterygoid implant and does not reach the plates of the sphenoid.

Characteristics of the tuberal implant:

Differences with the pterygoid implant

Compared to the pterygoid implant, the spinal implant anchors to the posterior nasal spine (12-16 mm) while the tuberal is inserted in the maxillary tuber (10-14 mm). The pterygoid, 19-21 mm long, reaches the sphenoid plates guaranteeing bicortical anchorage with excellent primary stability and immediate loading, making it the gold standard for severe atrophy in the Bilateral Sinus Solution™ (BSS).

CharacteristicSpinal implantTuberal implantPterygoid implant
Anchorage sitePosterior nasal spineMaxillary tuberTuber + sphenoid
Length12-16 mm10-14 mm19-21 mm
Bicortical anchorageSometimesRarelyYes
Primary stabilityGoodModerateExcellent
Immediate loadingOften yesSometimesYes
Main indicationAnatomical variantSufficient tuberal boneSevere atrophy

Specific indications

The choice between pterygoid, spinal and tuberal implant depends on the patient's bone morphology. The pterygoid implant is the gold standard for most severe atrophies in the Bilateral Sinus Solution™ (BSS). The spinal is preferable when the pterygoid path is obstructed. The tuberal can be used when the maxillary tuber is well preserved without the need to reach the sphenoid.

The choice between spinal, tuberal and pterygoid implant depends on the patient's bone morphology:

In the clinical practice of the Nicola Lettera Maxillofacial Team, the pterygoid implant remains the preferential choice for posterior rehabilitation in the Bilateral Sinus Solution™ (BSS) configuration, while spinal and tuberal implants represent variants for particular anatomical cases.

The anchorage anatomy

Profile of the skull
The profile of the skull: the basal anchorage areas in the deep skeleton. Image: LadyofHats — Wikimedia Commons, public domain

The Circolare d'Autore® prosthesis

Circolare d'Autore® is the registered dental prosthesis that completes the rehabilitation: 14 ceramic teeth without fake gum, all molars and posterior connections for basal implants that fully restore the 100x100 power of human chewing force and the masseter.

Discover all the details on the dedicated page: Circolare d'Autore® — the definitive prosthesis without fake gum.

Keywords: Pterygoid Implant · Tuber · BSS